Sharon you didn't address one issue I wrote about. You don't have
to.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Sharon Boone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Sharon Boone"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just commenting:
> > > Blue Bishop said: "Liberals gave us Kelo, and now their pinko-
> > >commie
> > > disrespect for private property rights continue at a local
level
> > >with this decision". So, Bishop, just what did you mean in
this
> > >statement?
> >
> >
> > The Supreme Court decision in the Kelo case last year that said
the
> > Constitution allows for private developers to take your home was
> > drafted by and joined by all the liberal Justices. The
> > conservatives (Thomas, Scalia, Rhenquist) were all against it.
> >
> > This is no surprise to conservatives, as liberal policy has
always
> > shown a disrespect for private property. The whole idea of
being
> > a "conservative" is to "conserve" for the people that which is
> > theirs. That's where the name comes from. Conservatism is a
> people
> > driven philosopy, not a government driven philosphy, which is
why I
> > subscribe to it.
> >
> >
> > > 1. What's wrong with being a Liberal?
> >
> > Liberals want government control of your property.
Conservatives
> > want you to control your own property.
> >
> >
> > > 2. Who YOU calling a pinko-commie?
> >
> > Anyone who does not respect private property rights.
> >
> > > 3. What IS a pinko-commie, Mr. Atty. at Law?
> > > Is that like being a little-pregnant? Black? Gay?
> >
> > The very basis for communism was that the government owned and
> > controlled all the property - poeple owned none of it. It is the
> > primary holding in the Communist Manifesto. Capitalism is the
> > opposite - people have the right to accumulate capital (which is
> > property).
> >
> > When I see liberals and conservatives, I see the debate over
> respect
> > for people's private property. The Kelo decision, for the first
> > time in a long time, showed that this is no academic or
> hypothetical
> > debate. It affects lives greatly. The entire American ideal of
> > freedom to control one's property was at stake in Kelo, and the
> > liberal justices moved us more toward the communist ideal of
> > government control of property. Pinko-commies.
> >
> > > 4. Why the Label, or the name-calling?
> >
> > If liberals don't want me calling them commies, they shouldn't
act
> > like commies as with the Kelo decision.
> >
> > > 5. Do you equate ALL Democrats as being pinko-commies,
liberals?
> >
> > No, not all. As I've said before, 99% of all democrats give the
> > rest of the democrats a bad name.
> >
> > > My take is that for being Liberal, meaning, FREE instead of
> > > encumbered and restricted, I have to put up with a "strict
> > > constructionist"? Code language for Southerners who crossed-
over
> > >to Republican, at the year 1964-65 for the Civil Rights Act,
> giving
> > >ME the Right to Vote and the right to sit in the front seat of
the
> > >bus?
> >
> > I don't know why liberal means "free" to you when it means the
> > government can take your property. Obviously conservative means
> free
> > because the whole idea of it is keeping government small and out
of
> > people's lives. That's free.
> >
> > A "strict constructionist" is someone that looks at the 5th
> > Amendment where it says government can only take your land
> > for "public use" and "strictly construes" the words - "use"
means
> > they have to "use" your property after they take it (train
station,
> > post office, etc.). A "loose constructionist" sees "public
use"
> > and "loosely construes" the word "use" as also meaning "good."
> > Since the government declares that the developer is more "good"
> than
> > you, they can take your house and give it to the developer,
> > because "use" now means "good."
> >
> > I believe laws should be interpreted using the words that are in
> > there. I'm a strict constructionist, and anyone who believes in
> > Democracy (people write the laws, not the courts) is a strict
> > constructionist too. More appropriately I'm an originalist, but
> that
> > is another topic.
> >
> > As for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Democrats filibustered
the
> > law. Republicans broke the filibuster. When the vote came,
more
> > Republicans voted "Yes" for it than Democrats did. If you
believe
> > your right to Vote and sit in the front of a bus is owed to the
> > Civil Rights Act of 1964, than you owe thanks to the Republicans
> who
> > were responsible for passing it.
> >
> > > Aren't you the guy that said "racism doesn't exist in AP"?
Just
> > > checking. Watch out for FLAMES!
> >
> > I still maintain there is no racism problem in Asbury. There is
a
> > problem with racists outside of here looking in at us, but no
> > problem among our people.
> >
> No, I DON'T Thank the Republicans or anyone, since I was already
an
> American Citizen, encumbered by "JIM CROW". The Constitution
WASN't
> being enforced! As usual, you've MIS-intrepreted what I've said to
> suit YOU! Conserve means to "hold back"! Liberal, means EVERYONE
has
> a chance. You, however are intrepreting conservatism as
liberalism.
> While this conservative government, run by your President
is "spying"
> on its' citizens is likened to Communism, where the people were
ruled
> by a restrictive government, that told kids to "tell on" their
> parents, friends, relatives and ANYONE THEY thought was a
dissident,
> THIS government is fast becoming a government RULED by a few,
rather
> than the MASSES! Your President received over $200K from
Abramoff,
> yet he claims to NOT know him! HAH! When Pigs Fly! Everyday these
> liars CHANGE their story, while trampling on the rights of others!
> being a liberal means "exposing" the corruption in this
government,
> in this city, if it exists and anywhere a so-called democracy is
> supposed to exist! Liberal? I'll stay one, thank you! As far as
> Republicans go, NONE of the so-called Republicans in the House or
> Senate today, voted in FAVOR of Civil-Rights! Isn't that why
Kennedy
> was assassinated? One of the reasons? Republicans are breaking the
> law everyday with this lobbyists scandal! I hope they ALL go to
jail,
> be impeached or whatever it takes to uphold the "rule of law"!
> Immeninant domain should be the PEOPLE KEEPING their land, not
having
> it forcibly taken by developers who are money-grabbing THIEVES!
> Those "shacks" passing for town-houses are disgraceful!
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
