--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan, > > That "problem" may have impacted the original plan to build on the Marine Grill site. I just > don't remember the details. I was a still a dumb kid then working on getting married. > > So you mean to say that in effect, The triangle comes with a beach (privatized) as well? > > Did any of the appraisals note that in their report of the triangle. > > The shifting of a vote date is nothing new in AP politics. From what I always heard, that was > the way to do it. Do it enough times, then no one shows up. > What I am saying is that it appears that the riparian grant is on the Marine Grill site and not the Triangle. In fact, the affidavit from NJDEP's engineer (for the settlement in court) delineated the grant to cover only a portion (27%) of the Marine Grill site as tidelands which was vested in the State. The balance (73%) was designated as uplands with title vesting in the City. The engineer simply put the wrong Block/Lot ID on the parcel, but the map clearly shows it NOT to be the Triangle. I have also seen a letter from a local engineering firm who is a consultant to the developer reaching the same conclusion as I do. I believe the City had these documents and should have also reached the same conclusion. I am contacting DEP just to make sure that I am right and if I am, then the hammer will drop. There is going to be consequences to lying to the public if that is what occurred.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
