To the Kerry Defenders, I need a number.
How many times does Kerry
have TO denigrate the Troops, then say he
didn't mean that, before you will
agree that he has a problems with
the Troops?
What's the
number?
Right now I'm up to 4 times:
1971: He called them rapists,
murderers and war criminals;
1972: He called them an anathema (means
something to be loathed);
2005: He called them terrorists against women and
children;
2006: He called them people who weren't smart.
I know - he
has an excuse for each one (yea right - no one else has
had to come up with
4 explanations).
Seriously, what is the number of times he has to
insult the Troops
before you agree he has a problem with them?
5
times? 7 times? 10 times?
Be careful, because if you make enough excuses
for a Troop basher,
you are on board with him and bashing them
too.
The Kerry ship is sinking. Jump off.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote:
>
>
> Hello _asburycouple@..._
(mailto:asburycoupl[EMAIL PROTECTED]) ,
> I agree with evrything you said in the
complete post attached.
> But regarding:
>
>
> This
kind of thing is exactly why we got four more years of Bush
in
> the
first place.
>
> The Dem's have never met an election they couldn't
lose... I only
> hope election day gets here soon before they blow this
one.
>
>
>
>
> A case could be made that, in
the last few election cycles, the
Gore, Kerry,
> and McCain camps,
among others, were never aggressive enough in
pushing back
> at the
Rove/Rush/Fox media machine.
>
> They never expected the silly
invented stuff to stick with
voters.
>
> Respectively:
"inventing the Internet"; Swift Boat charges, and
the whisper
>
campaign about a black child McCain fathered out of wedlock.
>
>
James Carville was quite good, working for Clinton in 90 and 94,
at
>
aggressively fighting back.
>
> Arianna may be the new Carville:
"What could be more absurd than
the White
> House of _George_
(http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm)
"I
> never met a sentence I didn't want to mangle" Bush jumping on John
Kerry for
> what was obviously a mangled attempt at humor?
>
>
>
> Cordiali saluti,
>
>
>
>
========Original Message========
> Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: In and Out
of Context Date: 11/2/2006
7:55:25 A.M.
> Eastern Standard Time From:
_asburycouple@..._
> (mailto:asburycoupl[EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
> Sent on:
>
>
>
> To me, focusing on what he
actually meant misses the point a bit,
as
> clearly he meant this as
a slap to Bush rather than the troops.
> Rather, it was his extremely
poor judgement in even going to a
place
> that could be so easily
mis-understood and maniplated by the
other
> side. The man has no
sense of humor and his words get eaten
alive,
> or did he not realize
than from the presidential run. Stop
already!
> This kind of thing is
exactly why we got four more years of Bush
in
> the first
place.
>
> If the shoe was on the other foot and a Republican made
this
> statement the Democrats would be going for the jugular on this
silly
> issue just as aggressively.
>
> The Dem's have
never met an election they couldn't lose... I only
> hope election day
gets here soon before they blow this one.
>
> --- In
_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
,
> MarioAPNJ@, Mari
> >
> >
> > In reference
to:
> >
> >
> > --- In _AsburyPark@ --- In
_AsburyPa
> (mailto:_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
) ,
> > docp101@ wrote:
> > Surely you're not suggesting that
Kerry did not say that?
> > _dfsavgny@ _dfsavgny@<WBR>._
_dfsavgny@<WBR
> > He said that, but it was not in reference to the
troops but the
> Bush
> > administration. You either take him
at his word or you don't.
> >
> >
> >
> >
The exact prepared text he was supposed to read was
specifically
>
targeted at
> > Bush:
> >
> > "â€Å"Do you know
where you end up if you don’t study,
if you
> aren’t
smart, if
> > you’re intellectually lazy? You end up getting us
stuck
in a war
> in Iraq.
> > Just ask President
Bush.â€Â
> >
> > And the videos of the speech indicate
that the audience got what
> he meant.
> >
> >
> >
> > ========Original Message===== ====
> >
> > Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: October School Board Meeting Date:
>
11/1/2006 11:04:51
> > A.M. Eastern Standard Time From: _dfsavgny@
A.
> > (mailto:dfsavgny@
(mailto:__AsburyPar[EMAIL PROTECTED]@_As_
> (mailto:_AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com)
_
> (mailto:_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
)
> > Sent on:
> >
> >
> >
> >
--- In _AsburyPark@ --- In _Asbury
>
(mailto:_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
) ,
> > docp101@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
Garrett,
> > >
> > > Surely you're not suggesting that
Kerry did not say that?
> >
> > He said that, but it was not
in reference to the troops but the
> Bush
> > administration.
You either take him at his word or you don't.
> >
> > >
God Bless America and our veterans!
> >
> > Ibid
>
>
>
