Historic district measure assailed

Battle brewing in Shrewsbury
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 01/18/07
BY KEITH BROWN \
COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU 

 Post Comment 
SHREWSBURY — Close to 50 residents … state Assemblyman Michael 
Panter among them … attended the Planning Board's first meeting of 
the year Wednesday to blast a proposed ordinance that would create a 
Historical Preservation Commission residents said would have too 
much power over their homes.

"This is eminent domain lite,'' Bill Dodge of Sycamore Avenue 
said. "It (the commission's power) tramples on the rights of 
property owners.''

The 18-page ordinance … aimed at creating a historical district that 
encompasses some 60 properties radiating out from the intersection 
of Sycamore Avenue and Route 35 … was introduced at the Borough 
Council's Jan. 3 meeting. It is now under 
consideration by the Planning Board and that panel has 35 days to 
make recommendations and send it back to the council, which has 
final say over its passage or defeat.

The ordinance calls for the creation of a seven-member commission. 
Chief among the new panel's duties would be to review any 
application before the Zoning Board of Adjustment or the Planning 
Board that affects a historic site, according to the ordinance.

But a provision of the ordinance addressing "preventative 
maintenance'' would allow borough officials to enter and assess a 
property in the historic district and could require the owner to 
make repairs based on that assessment.

That raised the ire of Panter, a Sycamore Avenue resident whose home 
would be affected by the ordinance. 

"In my opinion, these provisions are draconian and onerous,'' he 
said. "They cross the line and infringe on the property rights of 
those who own a historic home.''

Planning Board attorney Michele Donato defended the ordinance, 
saying it was a "tremendous improvement'' that would bring the 
borough into compliance with land use law. She also said the 
proposal would streamline the process of repairing 
historic homes and compared it to a similar ordinance already in 
effect in Cape May that she said works well.

Currently, Donato said, any construction proposed to a historic site 
has to come before the Planning Board. The ordinance under 
consideration proposes to shift much of that responsibility to the 
Historical Commission to expedite the 
necessary approvals. 

Homeowners not consulted 

But none of the residents who spoke Wednesday seemed to believe that.

"I'm deeply concerned about the tenor of this ordinance and that not 
a single one of the homeowners were asked for input,'' said Bill 
Crome of Sycamore Avenue.

Board member Kevin Murphy said that "some of the language in there 
is strong and maybe could be toned down.'' But, he said, there was 
no "malicious intent'' on the part of the Planning Board. 

Board Chairman John Madden said the board would not take a position 
on the ordinance until the panel had heard from all residents who 
wanted to speak. He said the board would take up the issue again at 
its Feb. 21 meeting.

Dodge, in an interview outside the meeting, said residents were not 
going to let the issue drop and vowed to continue fighting the 
ordinance at the Planning Board and, later, the Borough Council.

"This is not going to go away,'' he said. 

Keith Brown: (732) 643-4076 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to