Old habits never die.  

----- Original Message ----
From: Hinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2007 9:35:48 AM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Audit: Asbury agency should return $1.6M


Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 06/9/07

BY NANCY SHIELDS
COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU

ASBURY PARK — The city Housing Authority should pay back at least $1.6 million 
to the 
state Office of Public Housing for mismanaging the maintenance of its housing 
units and 
for unreasonable employee compensation, according to a federal audit.

The audit, issued May 24 by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 
Development' s 
Office of Inspector General, says the authority did not have procedures set to 
contain 
administrative costs, repair and improve properties in a timely manner and buy 
equipment 
such as interconnected smoke detectors at a lower price suggested by architects.

"As a result $692,990 in capital funds was used for ineligible expenses, 
$721,701 was not 
obligated in a timely manner, and the funds were not available to address the 
authority's 
needed capital improvements, " the audit says.

It also said the authority failed to reduce the salaries of employees who were 
demoted, 
and paid maintenance workers for ineligible and overtime expenses that exceeded 
budget 
limits.

HUD asked that the authority repay $190,339 for excessive employee compensation.

Rudolph Pierre, the authority chairman, characterized the report as unfair and 
said the 
authority is appealing the findings.

"They are totally wrong," Pierre said of the federal auditors. "They're wrong 
by . . . making 
a recommendation to HUD to micromanage the housing authority."

The audit states: "The authority does not have adequate controls in place to 
ensure that its 
preventive maintenance program is effective.

"This inadequacy occurred because the authority's staff was not skilled enough 
to 
complete some repairs, and the repairs were not inspected to ensure that they 
were 
adequately completed."

The inspector general's report said the audit was undertaken late last fall 
after a request 
by the HUD Newark Field Office director "who was concerned about the physical 
condition 
of the units and mismanagement at the Housing Authority of the City of Asbury 
Park."

Eighteen of 20 units that were inspected Oct. 6, 2006, had violations such as 
unsecured 
and damaged fixtures, unhealthy plumbing problems, unsafe windows and doors, 
inoperable cooking equipment and damaged structural items, the report says.

The audit points to management problems under the last two executive directors 
— 
Harold Phipps, who was hired in March 2002 and fired in December 2003, and 
Stanley 
Smith, who spent several months under an interim director, William Reid, before 
being 
officially hired as executive director in July 2004.

Last week, Smith announced he was resigning as of July 31 for health reasons. 
Authority 
officials said he was on vacation in Bermuda this week and could not be reached 
for 
comment.

Thomas Furlong, the authority's accountant, said a key item in the audit was 
the authority 
not meeting a May 30, 2004, deadline to have obligated or spent funds for 
certain capital 
improvements.

"There was a change over from the time when Mr. Phipps left and Mr. Smith took 
over, and 
the housing authority tried to extend that deadline, and HUD didn't let them," 
Furlong 
said.

The authority now contends that if it is penalized for not getting the money 
spent in time, 
it should have to pay just a small portion of the amount, and not the full 
$721,701 the 
inspector general is requesting.

The audit says the authority asked HUD to extend the obligation deadline from 
May 30 to 
Oct. 30, 2004. The request said that "the previous executive director (Harold 
Phipps) has 
mismanaged the authority's public housing capital fund program and that the 
program's 
records were difficult to locate and understand."

The types of contracts the authority entered into after May 30, 2004, were for 
roofing 
services and installation of fire and emergency systems that were being carried 
out too 
late, after the 24-month period when the funds were approved.

"As a result, needed capital improvements were not made in timely manner," the 
audit 
says.

The audit also says the authority paid $126,428 for interconnected smoke 
detectors 
instead of a more reasonable price determined by external architects and 
planners.

It says, too, that in October 2004 under Smith, the security director's 
position was given to 
an individual from Orange. The person who had been security director was 
demoted to 
security guard but with no decrease in pay.

In addition, the audit says that from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2006, 
the authority 
made $65,312 in payments to its maintenance personnel for overtime hours that 
may not 
have been in accordance with the contract between the authority and maintenance 
employees.

On Friday, a spokesman for the HUD Newark Field Office said his office and the 
Office of 
Inspector General will review the findings and the information provided by the 
housing 
authority.

The Newark office will reach a management decision on the findings within 60 
days of May 
24, when the report was issued, the spokesman said.





       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the 
tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting 

Reply via email to