ok dan, thank you. you have done so much for this city...NOT!!!
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, restore881FM@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > I'm amazed by the Press' reaction to this MM deal with Asbury
> Partners. The 
> > editorial board interview was a cream puff job. No financials --
> again!! The 
> > only way to be confident of the partnership is to know what 
they're
> in for - a 
> > dime or a dollar. What's the commitment? Is there an out clause? 
Do
> we get to 
> > see this contract - ever? 
> > And, why should it cost AP anything????? 
> > Can you say Breach of Contract? Does anyone recall the Dispute
> Resolution 
> > Agreement? 
> > Isn't this allowing the Partners to dodge another commitment and 
more 
> > deadlines? Tell me where it's not so.  
> > Another round of negotiating is necessary, says Bruno. Another 
round of 
> > private - out of the public eye talk among the principals - who
> don't include you 
> > or me. This basically allows the City to acquiesce instead of
> pressing its 
> > rightful legal position with the Partners. Now the City will be 
one
> more entity 
> > removed from enforcing its rights. Gees, only a lawyer like 
Faiella
> could feel 
> > comfortable plunging into a tangled web like this one. Oh, that's
> right, 
> > Faiella is the Partners' lawyer. 
> > What did the editorial board story say, Lamle is a 50% partner?
> Lamle? We 
> > know that Cherokee is a 50% partner. So who's out of the game? 
Or is
> the Press 
> > just playing loose with the facts again? As in oh they declined 
to
> discuss the 
> > financial end of this reportedly $150 million investment. The
> financials are 
> > the story!!! 
> > How does the City enforce its interests in this deal if it's 
between
> the 
> > Partners and MM? 
> 
> 
> I asked all these questions and more of Terry Reidy in a phone
> conversation 2 months ago. His reply - "good questions Dan." That 
was
> in response to receiving some of he answers I asked for about
> ownership of Partners. All I got was a list of LLCs (limited 
Liability
> companies). Terry said the negotiations will not be out of the 
public
> eye. I guess that was satisfy me. I have no more patience or time 
for
> this nonsense. They are going to do what they want.
> 
> Something is wrong when credit wants to be taken for every drop of
> rain that falls from heaven during their term but if bird shit 
rains
> down, it ain't their fault. 5-6 years and still can't balance a
> budget. The only reason something is happening now is because of
> pressure from the naysayers.
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to