We are apparently on the same page, as always!  I saw this broadcast
too!  Incredible, huh?

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/31/2007 2:02:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You have a lot of nerve complaining about a
> powerful force of American soldiers bringing the
> war to the very geographical location that all these plots eminae
> from....you better pay more heartfelt attention to the "Blood & Limb
> costs" associated with war.
> 
>     The words of those who sent those soldiers to that location at the
> cost of their blood and limbs:   Dick Cheney during an interview at the
> conservative American Enterprise Institute in 1994    Q: Do you think
> the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad?
> A: No.
> 
> Q: Why not?
> 
> A: "Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone.
> There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been
> a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to
> fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.
> 
> "Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's
> government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a
> very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central
> government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq
> fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of
> it -- eastern Iraq -- the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over
> it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the
> Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten
> the territorial integrity of Turkey.
> 
> "It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.
> 
> "The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we
> were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the
> 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families, it wasn't a
> cheap war. And the question for the president, in terms of whether or
> not we went on to Baghdad, took additional casualties in an effort to
> get Saddam Hussein, was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam
> worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right."
> 
> ============================================
> 
> The so-called liberal media never reported those Cheney words.  A C-Span
> viewer spotted it recently and posted it on YouTube:   Click here:
> YouTube - Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire C-SPAN
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I>
> ================================================= And junior should have
> been as wise a papa:    "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam" -- George Bush
> [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft  Our prompt withdrawal helped cement our
> position with our Arab allies, who now trusted us far more than they
> ever had. We had come to their assistance in their time of need, asked
> nothing for ourselves, and left again when the job was done.   Full text
> from 1998 Click here: Reasons Not to Invade Iraq, by George Bush Sr. -
> Global Policy Forum - UN Security Council
>
<http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/2003/0419reaso\
> nsnot.htm>  
> =================================================================  
> Anyone using the war for party gain should be deported. Some would say
> impeach first.      Cordiali saluti,
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to