--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "arcman210" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Still have no clue as to what the reasoning is behind leaving the motel
> portion standing.
>
Not to reward the owner for letting the buildings deteriorate. The
site is zoned exclusivly for hotel use. The older portion posed a
safety hazard and the city forced the building owner to demolish it.
The newer portion is not a hazard. I am sure he would like to be able
to demolish it as well and have the site rezoned.
This is why you need tough preservation laws. We seem to have no
preservation laws. You can stop someone from demolishing something but
generally you cannot force them to maintain it. That can and should be
changed. That owner got away with murder.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
