On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Andreas Hoenen wrote: > Guido Ostkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip/> > > > It fails on the 'dedication' stuff. If you remove it, the PDF doc can be > > produced. > > > > I have raised an dblatex error report for this: > > <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1838293&group_i > >d=72607&atid=535062> > > > > Let's see whether they can fix it. > > <snip/> > > Hi, > > attached is a patch of dblatex's author (based on release 0.2.8) that > fixes the dedication issue. (By the way, to avoid adorning myself with > borrowed plumes: "they" is Benoit Guillon, contrary to the wrong > information in the SuSE and Fedora packages I'm only the Debian > packager, but not a dblatex author.) > > The patch should be straightforward to apply if you want to further > experimentalize with AsciiDoc and dblatex. I will include the patch in > the upcoming Debian dblatex release 0.2.8-1, and I assume it will be > also part of the next upstream release. >
How confident are you in the correctness of this patch? I am thinking to include this in fedora 0.2.8-2. _______________________________________________ asciidoc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.metaperl.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asciidoc-discuss
