Block images can have a title, inline images can't (I think?). Most of the time a block image would be (part of) a figure (example[1]). As you can see in the example the “tiger“ image is listed in the List of Figures, while the “new” image ist not. You can also reference block images[2].
Bela [1]http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/book.html#id2541701 [2]http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/ userguide.html#_internal_cross_references On 21 Jun., 17:24, HelperMethod <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't understand in which context an image block macro would be > preferable to an image inline macro. > > I played around with a little test document and the only difference I > could see is that I could "inline" (who would have guessed ;-)) the > inline macro. So why not always use the inline version? > > Which one should I use by default? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
