On 27/11/11 13:30, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Stuart Rackham wrote:
The code filter is didactic example I wrote to illustrate how to write a
filter (http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#X56), strictly
speaking it probably shouldn't even be in the distribution. If you want to
take it further then the best course would be to rename your enhanced
version and publish it as a filter plugin.
I understand.
I don't want to take it further, in fact I just finished color highlight
support for the source-highlight project for ODF output, and that is clearly
the way forward.
But for the people that try code-filter, having ODF and bash/ksh support might
be sufficient. Even if it's a didactic example ?
I have to add to this that the AsciiDoc User Guide does use the code-filter and
therefor without these improvements added, will fail to convert to ODF.
For that reason I would recommend adding ODF support to upstream's code-filter.
Adding additional languages doesn't add anything in terms of illustrating how to
write a filter and would just encourage people to use it in production. If
someone has a burning desire to use and extend it then they should fork it and
publish it as a filter plugin.
Cheers, Stuart
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
