On 10/10/12 11:49, Lex Trotman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10 October 2012 04:34, Jens Getreu <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     I observed the following behavior:
> 
>      1. Without :data-uri: directive: Paths in subdocuments to images
>         are relative to the location of the main document.
>      2. With :data-uri: Paths in subdocuments to images are relative to
>         the location of the subdocument.
> 
>     I usually use the 2. because my subdocuments are independent
>     projects with separate resources. Unfortunately not all backends
>     implement the 2. correctly yet.
>     For example the html4 and odt backends do not therefore my projects
>     do not compile with these backends.
> 
> 
> The ODT backend is a separate project, please file an issue on its site. 
> 
> Data-uri is not supported by HTML, only xhtml and html5.
> 
> They should all follow type two, but there is a bug(s).
> 
> @Stuart, documentation says images are relative to the referring
> document.  Data-uri correctly uses {indir}/{imagesdir}/{target} but non
> data-uri uses {imagesdir}/{target} which makes them relative to the
> *working* directory (if {imagesdir} is not absolute), not the document
> directory. It is therefore wrong if for example the document is an
> included document from another directory, or asciidoc wasn't run in the
> document directory.
> 
> Documentation doesn't mention absolute being accepted, but I'll bet
> there are lots of documents that depend on that :( so it isn't just as
> simple as sticking an {indir={outdir}} on the front for non-datauri I
> don't think.

This would probably work:

{eval:os.path.join(r"{indir={outdir}}",r"{imagesdir=}",r"{target}")}

because if {imagesdir=} is absolute os.path.join() will override the
preceding {indir={outdir}}

But is will break documents out there that rely on this undocumented quirk?

Cheers, Stuart


> 
> Cheers
> Lex
>  
> 
> 
>     The :data-uri: directive is meant to embed media HTML5. So the
>     described behavior is just a side effect? Is it possible to control
>     how paths are interpreted by other means then :data-uri: ?
> 
>     If not, there should be a directive doing so.
> 
>     -- 
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>     Groups "asciidoc" group.
>     To view this discussion on the web visit
>     https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/-/uIpKdckPkwYJ.
>     To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>.
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:asciidoc%[email protected]>.
>     For more options, visit this group at
>     http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "asciidoc" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.

Reply via email to