Stargazer, Have you tried the Python 3 port at asciidoc/asciidoc-py3, its intended to be compatible (as possible), so your tooling will keep working?
Cheers Lex On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 14:21, Stargazer <prusselltechgr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Tried AsciiDoctor awhile back. We prefer Python 3, rather than Ruby. There > were some issues that we would have to address that would require changes to > our doc, > config files, and/or procedures. > > Thanks for all the updates. > >> > Really like Asciidoc and recommend it all the time. >> >> Good to hear, but don't forget that there is also the Asciidoctor >> implementation. Its active and (as I am not a direct contributor to >> Asciidoctor I can say this without blowing my own trumpet) MUCH faster >> than Asciidoc Python. And as it is moving to reduce the reliance on >> the Docbook toolchains is probably more suitable for new users. >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to asciidoc+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to asciidoc@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to asciidoc+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to asciidoc@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
