Nicely put, Dan. Thank you for chipping in. Any ideas about what would be 
the best DocBook *toolchain* to use? And, is *a2x* still the best *toolchain 
manager*?

I'm now wondering if it is possible, at all, to have *a2x* installed 
without the legacy AsciiDoc processor. I'm betting, however, this is not 
only technically unpractical, but outright heresy... What are your thoughts 
on this Lex? Please, have mercy on me ;-)

I'm thinking of using AsciiDoc (and, most probably, Asciidoctor, giving the 
fact that my *AsciiDoc.py* installation is still at an impasse) for writing 
my notes, blog posts, invoices and reports, while still using LaTeX for 
what it is best at, i.e., working with---and beautifully 
typesetting---formulas and abundant amounts of bibliographical material to 
be printed out (and possibly published). Even so, I would like to have the 
opportunity of working with a DocBook toolchain from time-to-time, to try 
out new things.

Thank you all for your thoughtful responses.

Cheers,

Zam
El martes, 2 de marzo de 2021 a la(s) 03:04:26 UTC-5, [email protected] 
escribió:

> > Lex wrote:
> > asciidoctor can generate docbook so it can be fed to dblatex and latex 
> in the same way.  Or the xslproc/fop chain can be used.
>
> To confirm, I use the later pipeline from time to time, as do several 
> heavy Asciidoctor users. I think Apache FOP does an amicable job of 
> generating PDFs from DocBook and is actually where some of the inspiration 
> for Asciidoctor PDF originated. (Asciidoctor PDF has gone a lot further, 
> but FOP still does some things better, like footnotes). I test the dblatex 
> pipeline less often because dblatex requires so many packages to be 
> installed. When I do need to test it, I tend to resort to Docker so I can 
> keep it contained. But I do know that it works. It might be a topic worthy 
> of some documentation on the Asciidoctor docs site.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -Dan
>
> -- 
> Dan Allen (he, him, his) | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/a375a7cc-4b39-40c4-9372-eac7519fb886n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to