Faré writes: > Sorry to parasite this mailing-list, but I'm trying to design the > testing aspect of XCVB right now. The constraint is that we want to be > able to use make as a backend, and that test results should thus be > reified as files if we want to avoid re-running already-computed > tests.
Are you sure that XCVB is the right level for that? Shouldn't that be the duty of your test framework? Is XCVB implemented on top of some sort of general dependency graph management library? -T. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
