On 3/5/10 Mar 5 -12:06 PM, james anderson wrote: > good evening; > > on the occasion of pushing de.setf.graphics down the wire, when i > built it for ccl/sbcl i did an obligatory pull on asdf and observe > that something changed in the treatment of modules' component > relative pathnames. with the effect that it was no longer possible > possible to build clx. the clx-0-7-4 version as (:relative) > specification in module pathnames which ran afoul of the asdf > changes. i applied the same tactic as i have previously found > effective for source file components and was able to build. the diff > [1] is posted with the graphics sources. > > on other semi-related matters, i can report, that i have now an s3 > ami (linux-2.6.31+ubuntu++^3) with which i can boot an ec2 instance > with all pieces in place to run the target lisp implementations. > > > --- > [1] : http://github.com/lisp/de.setf.graphics/blob/master/readmes/ > asdf.diff
I reviewed this modification and I'm not sure I understand the implications. This seems to squash Fare's component-name-to-pathname-components call, and I don't know what implications that has for his newfangled component names like (:file "foo/bar"). [As an aside, do we have tests for these? I see them only in test-module-pathnames and only in one location...] I'm reluctant to apply this patch without more understanding of its effects. Best, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
