On 2010-03-18, at 19:44 , Faré wrote: >>> : fare >> : janderson > [...] > >> wrt. methods on the basis of 1.648, there are very few methods which >> are not already fully specialized and as such amenable to such rules. >> > I don't get it. > >> perform-with-restarts has a default method as the next method for >> the :around methods. one could argue that this should be distinct >> base methods, but i don't see a clear reason to do that - especially >> as it is intended to be _the_ default method. >> > Can do. What would that buy us? > >> output-files has an :around method which could be specialized. >> > And your conclusion is?
That there would be no changes required in the asdf implementation itself in order to institute such a rule. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
