Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> writes: > On 4/11/10 Apr 11 -11:42 AM, Faré wrote: >> 1- Would making unix-dso a subclass of component but not of module >> somehow help solve the problem? > > <blush>I didn't even carefully read the system definition --- I just dug > in to trying to make it load. You are right --- I don't see any reason > why this should be a subclass of module instead of component.</blush>
Well, I think it is a module because it has components. In that small example it has only one, but the in the full matlisp.asd there are a few submodules to it. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
