On 19 November 2010 15:22, Krzysztof Drewniak <krzysdrewn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rationale: > To make asdf easier to use by providing a standard interface for > configuring, installing, and removing systems > > Details: > To facilitate easier configuration, installation, and removal of asdf > systems, I propose 2 new operations and 2 new functions be added. > The operations would be install-op and remove-op, and the functions > would be configure and config-of > > * New function: configure > * New operation: install-op > * New function config-get > * New operation: remove-op [...]
1- No one else than yourself will implement this proposal. 2- It's not clear that anyone would use it. What problem are you solving? How does it help? 3- As for precise semantics, how do your operations recurse or not recurse to dependencies? 4- How do you distinguish between fasls compiled with different options. > [P.S. I will not be available between 09/22/2010 and 09/29/2010 due to a > vacation resort in Mexico which has an 80% chance of no free Internet] Your .sig is obsolete. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] "Crash programs fail because they are based on theory that, with nine women pregnant, you can get a baby a month." — Wernher Von Braun, when asked by the US government why tossing scientists at the 'space race' was not helping. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
