> testing has to be manual, but releasing does not have to be. > (and can include many different consistency checks)... > Sure. And even the manual steps could be accounted for by a checklist enforced by nagging. Will work on it for next release. Maybe.
>> It's immaterial which version is shown there. > immaterial, but confusing. > IMO, it should either be the current version or something clearly > abstract, e.g., "0.1234567". Now "2.345". Hope this helps. Thanks for your feedback, [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] If you're wrong against the dominant ideology, you'll be laughed at. If you're right against the dominant ideology, you'll be hated. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
