>> A cursory googling shows that system-definition-pathname is used by >> bese qbook's publish-op. Should I reinstate system-definition-pathname >> as an alias for system-source-file, or should I expect qbook to be >> updated if anyone ever uses it again? > > I'm inclined to think that reinstating it, and making it raise a style > warning for deprecation would be best. Just on the grounds that the API > should stay stable until someone masochistic enough to build ASDF 3 > comes along! That way we will get fewer bug reports/questions. > In .8 I'm considering reinstating it, with a cerror instead of merely a warning.
And I'm the masochist, except I say "XCVB" instead of "ASDF 3". [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] My understanding of macros is expanding — Matthias Felleisen wrt the PLT Scheme module system _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
