On 9/9/11 Sep 9 -2:50 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Robert Goldman <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > I think it is safe (shouldn't interfere with any other implementations > use of ASDF), but this use of *FEATURES* at *run-time* instead of the > conventional use at compile-time makes me feel a little uncomfortable. > It feels to me like an abuse of a facility. > > > Right now this is how my two compilers expose their presence to their > users. I do not see how this could be an abuse and why further variables > are needed. Besides, this is ECL's design, not ASDF's.
OK. But why do you need to do (member :foo *features*) instead of #+foo ? That was the original question. thanks, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
