On 6/15/12 12:25 PM, Faré wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 6/12/12 12:37 PM, Faré wrote: >>> I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. >>> Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow: >> >> Since I didn't see any mention of it, I ran the test with cmucl 2012-06 >> (the very latest snapshot). All tests pass, so I'll be including asdf >> 2.22 in the next snapshot. >> > Oh, excellent. > > As usual before release (but unhappily not always - woe to me), > I made sure that all our tests pass against > all the supported Linux x64 implementations: > ccl clisp sbcl ecl cmucl abcl scl allegro lispworks > (the complete test suite currently takes almost 2 hours; > I haven't tried parallelizing it, though). > The CMUCL I used was 2012-04. > > I don't remember - did we ever get to the root of > the low-level failures we used to have with CMUCL? What was it?
No, I have not investigated that. Probably something PCL related about upgrading asdf. Ray _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
