Faré <[email protected]> writes: >> The short life of asdf-utils is causing me a huge headache. >> > asdf-utils still exists. Now it's just a thin wrapper over asdf-driver. > I broke it briefly, thinking it had no clients (none showing in quicklisp); > I didn't you of all people were using it, after your complaining that asdf > should export utilities at all.
When ASDF exported utilities, I did not use ASDF as library of utility functions. When the independent library asdf-utils exported utilities, I used them. >> The incompatibilities introduced in ASDF are causing me a huge headache. >> > I've been working hard to resolve them. > There's no way the old ASDF could be fixed without a complete rewrite, > and that was bound to introduce some minor incompatibilities, > especially in cases where clients software were exploiting > unsupported interfaces or outright bugs. The only positive practical difference I've seen between ASDF 1 and ASDF 2 is the automatic FASL segregation. Please keep an audience like me in mind when documenting feature updates. Zach _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
