On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert P. Goldman <[email protected]>wrote:
> I see that the BUNDLE-PATHNAME-TYPE for :dll is "so" on all unixes. > Question: should this be "dylib" on Mac OS X instead? > I certainly think that would be a "yes."
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert P. Goldman <[email protected]>wrote:
> I see that the BUNDLE-PATHNAME-TYPE for :dll is "so" on all unixes. > Question: should this be "dylib" on Mac OS X instead? > I certainly think that would be a "yes."