On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: >> I think it's the right thing to do. Let's see what happens in cl-test-grid. >> Meantime, to the parsing code for my caching slots, I will add a check for >> obsolete FEATURE syntax with an error message indicating the appropriate >> repair (and a test case). > > This patch is pushed now (not a new version yet).
I believe that the :if-feature option, not the :feature dependency-def, is the proper replacement for the former feature requirement, and the error message should be changed accordingly. I'm using the names from the defsystem grammar in asdf.texinfo. These names might be cleaned up a bit to match the source, and/or the source might be changed to match the documentation. For instance, the source uses resolve-dependency-spec where the texinfo speeks of dependency-def; also, the source speaks of component-depends-on where the documentation might speak of action requirement. Meh. > I'd like to see the few remaining known bugs fixed, and am editing the ASDF > manual as much as I can in my spare time before the next release. > Do you have a list of bugs you want fixed before release? If it's more than one or two, maybe it's worth an entry in the TODO file. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Supporting Windows is like buying a puppy. The dog only cost $100, but we spent another $500 cleaning the carpet. — Marc Dodge, OPEN COMPUTING, December 1994.