On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Pascal Costanza <p...@p-cos.net> wrote:
> I'm expecting asdf to suddenly see asd files that it shouldn't. (In my 
> configuration, only ~/lisp/develop/ contains "active" systems, the rest of 
> ~/lisp may contain "inactive" ones - for example, alternate versions of the 
> same systems.)
>
That's a fair complaint. And whichever name(s) we choose (if any),
there is the potential for a similar complaint.

Of course, you can always :ignore-inherited-configuration, but then
you might have to reproduce some of it that you like, and that's
painful.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
"I object to doing things that computers can do."
        — Olin Shivers

Reply via email to