>>>> 1- I think we should proceed and add a default path anyway. >>>> ~/cl/ and/or ~/common-lisp/ sound fine to me, and I've seen no one >>>> complain about that. >>>> You could make it ~/local/common-lisp/ if you're into larger paths. > > I think I will put "asdf" into the pathname, per our earlier discussion, > so that we don't step on pre-existing paths. > > ~/asdf-local-paths/ > > would work for me. > I really don't like including asdf in the name, especially since other tools than asdf exist and may exist in the future, and will want to share the common-lisp source code hierarchy.
~/local/common-lisp/ has the advantage of being clutter-limiting, XDG-like if not strictly XDG, clean, etc., and just one character longer than your proposal. ~/common-lisp/ is slightly more pretentious, but probably works, too. ~/cl/ is taking a lot of familiarity, and maybe I should keep it my personal configuration rather than a recommended default. > Squawks sooner rather than later, please. > Squawk, squawk! —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org *EULA: By reading or responding to this message you agree that all my stated or unstated opinions are correct.* "EULA" — patent pending.
