Faré wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Faré <f...@tunes.org> wrote: >> I will still wait for comments, but unless a better proposal comes along >> and/or Robert vouches for a different name, I will rename package-system to: >> one-package-per-file >> > On the other hand, Jean-Philippe Paradis just proposed > package-inferred-system that doesn't look bad. > > Well, I'm hoping to hear from you about a choice between these two > names (or other proposals). > > one-package-per-file > vs > package-inferred-system
I prefer package-inferred-system and package-derived-system, FWIW. cheers, r _______________________________________________ Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel