Faré wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Faré <f...@tunes.org> wrote:
>> I will still wait for comments, but unless a better proposal comes along
>> and/or Robert vouches for a different name, I will rename package-system to:
>>     one-package-per-file
>>
> On the other hand, Jean-Philippe Paradis just proposed
> package-inferred-system that doesn't look bad.
>
> Well, I'm hoping to hear from you about a choice between these two
> names (or other proposals).
>
> one-package-per-file
> vs
> package-inferred-system

I prefer package-inferred-system and package-derived-system, FWIW.

cheers,

r

_______________________________________________
Asdf-devel mailing list
Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Reply via email to