Hello list,
I just stumbled overthe following strangeness [1]:
I've some code in directory foo that contains two asdf files, foo.asd
and foo-test.asd, the later contains the following definition:
(defsystem "foo-test"
:version "0.1"
:pathname "t"
:serial t
..... )
Now, if I evaluate
(asdf:system-relative-pathname :foo-test "baz" :type "rsc")
I get a pathname relative to the _asdf-file_, while evaluating:
(merge-pathnames "baz.rsc" (slot-value (asdf:find-system :foo-test)
'asdf::absolute-pathname))
yields the correct/expected pathname (i.e. one that honors the pathname
spec. of the asdf system).
Is this really intended behavior or just an oversight?
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
Footnotes:
[1] in the sense of not following the principle o fleast astonishment
_______________________________________________
Asdf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
