I"ve generated another report where CFFI-TOOLCHAIN errors are filtered out: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-53.html
What do you think of the remaining errors? 26.12.2016, 02:28, "Faré" <[email protected]>: > This is a bug I introduced in cffi-toolchain, where the conditional > asdf-compat file breaks the chain of :serial t when it is not defined > because the implementation already has a recent enough asdf. > > I sent a pull request for CFFI: https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/111 > > Please use that, too :-( > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. > — H. L. Mencken > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Anton Vodonosov <[email protected]> wrote: >> 25.12.2016, 21:34, "Faré" <[email protected]>: >> >> What I meant is that SBCL 1.1.10 is over three years old. Should we really >> be supporting anything older than two or three years? >> >> I personally don't know - my job is to report. >> >> The "no package with name "CFFI-TOOLCHAIN" error hapens on ECL 16.1.2. - >> quite new one. CC Daniel Kochmanski. >> >> I've reprinted the report with lisp name on every row in case too many rows >> fall under the same value of lisp implementation, to make it easier to see >> what lisp was used: >> >> file:///home/anton/my/prj/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid2/reports-generated/asdf/asdf-diff-52.html
