> :Robert > Am I correct in thinking that Dave's way of building monolithic bundles of > either fasls or source code are, at least potentially, a baby version of > cross-compilation? It seems like these are interesting specifically because > they could be loaded into different images (otherwise, it's not clear to me > why it would be better to build a monolithic FASL than just build an image). > Indeed, (monolithic) bundles are compiled in one image, loaded in another. Same implementation, but different image. But then, as much may apply to regular fasls; and this matters when e.g. some #+ compilation happens based on user-configured features.
> In that case, since this would effectively be cross-compilation (albeit a > trivial case of it), it's not surprising that the logic for dealing with > built-in dependencies like ASDF can go awry. > Indeed. > In which case delivering with Docker might be the better approach! ;-) > Did you mean Bazel? :-) —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org What is the shortest joke? — Communism What is the longest joke? — 70 years of Communism in Russia
