The static part is known at compile-time - no reflective overhead. http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.eclipse.org+thisJoinPointStaticPart
"Using thisJoinPointStaticPart will avoid the run-time creation of the join point object that may be necessary when using thisJoinPoint directly" http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/language-thisJoinPoint.html Wes > ------------Original Message------------ > From: Gregory Kedge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Date: Sat, Sep-2-2006 4:35 PM > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint SourceLocation vs. Stack Trace > Interigation > > I haven't. I will do diligence to figure out what advantage > thisJoinPointStaticPart will bring to me, but if you(or anyone else) > can share with me what you expect me to discover, please do... > > Kind Regards, > Greg Kedge > > > > On Sep 2, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Eric Eide wrote: > > > "Gregory" == Gregory Kedge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Gregory> It is my understanding that the use of JoinPoint is a > > Gregory> reflective operation. [...] > > > > Have you considered using `thisJoinPointStaticPart'? > > > > Eric. > > > > -- > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------- > > Eric Eide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . University of Utah School > > of Computing > > http://www.cs.utah.edu/~eeide/ . +1 (801) 585-5512 voice, +1 (801) > > 581-5843 FAX > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
