I tried to do exactly the same aspect using "code style" and it worked
perfectly. But in the doc I found this:
"Whichever style you use, the AspectJ weaver ensures that your program
has exactly the same semantics."
I think this is not true! "this" returns different instances in the
different styles.
Is this a bug in the annotation style or is this intended?!?!?
I really like the annotation style with the LTW (very flexible and
dynamic, can even compile in Continuum without ajc etc......), but for
now it is unusable to me :-((
Please help!
Thanks
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:50 +0200, Roland Reckel wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem with the @DeclareParents annotation:
> this.getClass() returns the implementation class of the Aspect and not
> the "aspected" class.
>
> Is this a bug? Or does any other method exist to get the aspected class?
> BTW: I use AspectJ 1.5.3
>
> Here an example:
>
> @Aspect
> public class PersistenceAspect {
>
> public interface IPersistentObject {
> void store();
>
> void delete();
> }
>
> public static class PersistentObjectImpl implements
> IPersistentObject {
>
> public void store() {
> }
>
> public void delete() {
> System.out.println("Class: " + this.getClass()) // Does return
> PersistentAspect$PersistentObjectImpl !?!?!?!?
> }
> }
>
> @DeclareParents(value = "@lu.vdl.trasal.annotation.PersistentObject
> *", defaultImpl = PersistentObjectImpl.class)
> private IPersistentObject implementedInterface;
>
> }
>
>
> Does anybody have the same problem? (I found some mails with the same
> problem but no answer or bug report :-((
>
> Thx for your help
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
