Looks like a bug to me. AspectJ compiler should treat ITDs of privileged
aspect as if there are public introduction overriding any access
specification on the declaration itself.
-Ramnivas
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Dehua Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> See the sample code below,
>
> public class OneType {
> private String r;
> }
>
> privileged aspect A {
> private int OneType.r; //no error
> }
>
> Since aspect A is declared as privileged, so it should have access to the
> private filed "String OneType.r", therefore, the ITD "int OneType.r" is
> conflict with the "String OneType.r", I got no warning regarding this.
>
> However, I got an error for the following code,
> privileged aspect A {
> public int OneType.r; //[error] inter-type declaration from A
> conflicts with existing member: java.lang.String onType.r
> }
>
>
> Is this an intended behavior or a bug? I tried both 1.5.4 and
> DEVELOPMENT-20080125213731.
>
> --
> Dehua Zhang
> Sable Research Group, McGill University
> Montréal, Québec, Canada
> http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dzhang25 <http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/%7Edzhang25>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
