Hi.
As far as I can see this advice should be correct (in the sense that
it executes but has no visible effect on the program).
Eric
2008/4/25 vtitou vergeos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I try to use around advice for a general use. I would like to use around for
> all the methods of a class which one does not know in advance the functions.
> For example, for a class A has which has 6 methods and a file aspectJ which
> defines a pointcut A.* for all the methods of A, is it possible to define a
> generic around for example:
>
> pointcut methods (): execution (public A.* (...));
>
> Object around (): methods () {
> ….
> return proceed ();
> }
>
> knowing that the methods of A have different signatures ! I tested the code
> written above and it does not function, it never passes in the around
> method whereas with a before or an after for the same pointcut, it works
> very well. If somebody already had to deal with this problem, I am waiting
> your answers!
>
> Cordially
>
> Antoine
>
> ________________________________
> Avec Windows Live Messenger restez en contact avec tous vos amis !
> Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
--
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
