Can you show what you intent to do with the traditional syntax? That will help in showing if and how it can be mapped to @AspectJ.
-Ramnivas On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kashtan, Daniel <[email protected]>wrote: > Hey all, > > I have AspectJ working real nice right now and I would like to see if > @AspectJ can let me do those same things in a slicker fashion. I can > illustrate want I am thinking about by showing my function: > > undoService.addCallback(new ActionListener() > { > public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) > { > undoService.addEdit(new UndoableEditDocumentCustom(textField)); > } > }); > > Right now my actionPerformed is hard-wired to send my undoService that > particular UndoableEdit for a JTextfield. I'd like to automate the process > of adding these edits. Could I possibly add an annotation above my > JComponents that would be able to call the code above based on the type of > JComponent it is? I think I know how to do this in AspectJ, but I am having > a hard time grasping how @AspectJ works, so any suggestions or pointers > would be great :) > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the > sender. > Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely > those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT > Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for > the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by > any virus transmitted by this e-mail. > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
