The bcel used by AspectJ is not the same as the bcel available through the public bcel project, it has been rewritten multiple times to be more optimized for aspectjs use cases. I imagine using asm will still be a little quicker though and it is on the list to look at moving to it, but I haven't had the time.
Andy On 27 August 2010 00:51, Rajaraman Santhanam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Am new to the AspectJ and was toying around with ASM bytecode > instrumentation library for Java Performance Monitoring. My point of > interest in AspectJ is LTW which I tried and fits perfectly for > my necessity. Its quite a breeze to define the point of interests in the > target application. > Did anybody recently compared the performace of bcel usage in AspectJ with > that of ASM? Would like to hear about the LTW performance in comparison with > ASM. > Tried searching in the mailing lists and not able to find any recent > entries. Hence posting it here. > Regards, > Rajaraman > ps: mistakenly I sent a mail previously to aspectj-dev mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
