Hi Martin, Unfortunately I've only seen limited feedback. Emond has been commenting on https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278496 and I have addressed all the bugs with it that I am aware of, but I'm still not going to make it the default mode for AspectJ/AJDT until I get a few more positive results. Backporting it to 3.4 would also probably require a few users requesting it - maybe you can open a bug to do the backport work and see how many votes it collects.
cheers, Andy On 1 October 2010 02:24, "Martin Keßler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > is there any update/feedback regarding the memory consumption? Did it make a > difference and is there a chance you might backport it to 3.4? > We are using RSA and are really interested. > Thanks, > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Clement > Sent: Freitag, 13. August 2010 16:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT and memory > > On 12 August 2010 01:02, Thomas Hofmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is this available for Eclipse 3.4 as I am using RSA and as you might remeber >> have a quite large workspace? Currently I am using a max. heap size of 1300 >> MB. I would like to try the new options on this workspace. > > Backporting would be a large effort as AJDT and AspectJ are moving forward > quite rapidly now we have a larger team. If there was enough feedback that > this made an amazing difference on 3.5/3.6, we might think about the backport. > > cheers > Andy > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Clement >> Sent: Freitag, 6. August 2010 00:56 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [aspectj-users] AJDT and memory >> >> Hi, >> >> Under bug 278496 I've gradually been working on this, the idea is to reduce >> the memory used for compile-time weaving in AJDT, using something similar to >> the strategy I used to reduce memory for Loadtime weaving. >> >> The latest AJDT dev builds now include the first pass at these changes. You >> need to 'turn them on' as I don't want them default until I get some >> feedback on whether they behave. >> >> To configure them, open your project properties, go to AspectJ compiler, >> then scroll down to the bottom of the options panel and in the 'other' >> section in the free form text field enter: >> >> -Xset:minimalModel=true,typeDemotion=true >> >> Then work as normal. I'm interested in whether: >> - you see a noticeable reduction in heap usage (maybe turn on the >> eclipse heap status monitor under Window>Preferences>General) >> - you see a change in performance. With the more eager eviction model >> these options employ, there may be more messing around to compile >> stuff (probably only noticeable on full builds) >> - it breaks ! >> >> thanks for any feedback, >> Andy >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > -- > GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 ¿/mtl. ¿ Jetzt auch mit > gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
