Hi William, Want to raise a bugzilla for that? I can't immediately think of a reason not to do it.
Andy On 14 October 2010 11:33, William Louth (JINSPIRED.COM) <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like ModifiersPattern needs to be updated. > > static { > modifierFlags = new HashMap<String, Integer>(); > int flag = 1; > while (flag <= Modifier.STRICT) { > String flagName = Modifier.toString(flag); > modifierFlags.put(flagName, new Integer(flag)); > flag = flag << 1; > } > } > > > public static final int STRICT = 0x00000800; > > // Bits not (yet) exposed in the public API either because they > // have different meanings for fields and methods and there is no > // way to distinguish between the two in this class, or because > // they are not Java programming language keywords > static final int BRIDGE = 0x00000040; > static final int VARARGS = 0x00000080; > static final int SYNTHETIC = 0x00001000; > static final int ANNOTATION= 0x00002000; > static final int ENUM = 0x00004000; > static boolean isSynthetic(int mod) { > return (mod & SYNTHETIC) != 0; > } > > > On 14/10/2010 17:59, William Louth (JINSPIRED.COM) wrote: > > Is it possible to use "synthetic" as a valid modifier label in a pointcut? > Any specification of this modifier results in a parser exception. Maybe I am > missing something. > > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
