Hi Andy, thanks for your valuable comments and suggestions.
No, you can't use @withincode like that. It is not an unreasonable > requirement, so raise a bugzilla if you'd like to see it in the > future. > OK. I'll Kind Regards, Henrique On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Andy Clement <[email protected]>wrote: > No, you can't use @withincode like that. It is not an unreasonable > requirement, so raise a bugzilla if you'd like to see it in the > future. > > cheers > Andy > > 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <[email protected]>: > > Hi Andy and all, > > > > Yes, this documentation is helpful! Thanks. > > > > One more thing: Can I specify a property based matching by using a > > @withincode or @annotation? > > > > For example: We can have > > > > execution(@Trace !...@trace(TraceLevel.NONE) * *(..)) > > > > So, Can we use in a similar way when using a @ withincode for instance? > > > > Something like: @withincode(Trace(Tracel.Level.NONE)) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Henrique > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andy Clement <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Not sure what kind of matching you want to do (kind of joinpoint, kind > >> of annotation value). If I understand what you mean, there is already > >> some support for this, see the "annotation value matching" section in > >> (this is execution joinpoint, enum annotation value): > >> > >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-160.html > >> > >> optimized binding of values is in: > >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-161.html > >> > >> cheers, > >> Andy > >> > >> 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <[email protected]>: > >> > Hi Andy and all, > >> > > >> > Enjoying the subject of join points and annotations, > >> > > >> > I want to know if there is a possibility to match an annotated join > >> > point > >> > based on its property. However, without using the if pointcut... > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Henrique > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andy Clement < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Annotation: > >> >> > >> >> - augmenting (new values in existing annotations) > >> >> - replacing (of annotations/annotation values) > >> >> - removal of annotations > >> >> > >> >> are all candidate features. > >> >> > >> >> First two are here: > >> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313026 > >> >> > >> >> Haven't quite raised the bugzilla for the third yet, but might do the > >> >> work under that existing 313026. > >> >> > >> >> I'm seeing an increasing number of use cases for these features so > >> >> they aren't too far away. > >> >> > >> >> cheers, > >> >> Andy > >> >> > >> >> On 23 November 2010 01:07, Frank Pavageau <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Note that you can't modify an existing annotation, which would be > >> >> > quite useful in that context : changing the cache strategy between > >> >> > read-write and read-only for example (even if you have the source, > >> >> > different usage patterns can use different strategies on the same > >> >> > entities), or the fetching strategy indeed. It would be a useful > >> >> > AspectJ improvement IMHO, but there might be issues which explain > why > >> >> > it's not possible. Maybe Andy (or someone else) can shed some light > >> >> > on > >> >> > it. > >> >> > > >> >> > Frank > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, > >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Pffffffffffft : Sorry for the noise. All is explained in > >> >> >> documentation > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/annotations-declare.html > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> De : [email protected] > >> >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de > >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> Envoyé : mardi 23 novembre 2010 08:19 > >> >> >> À : [email protected] > >> >> >> Objet : [aspectj-users] aspectj joinpoint *for* Annotation ? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> is there a mean to weave and overload an annotation with AspectJ > >> >> >> LTW ? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> It would be interesting, for example to test with LTW weaving ORM > ( > >> >> >> Hibernate for fetching plan / strategy => lazy, eager) or caching > >> >> >> policy > >> >> >> ( Entirty/query cachable or not) when annotations are used > instead > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> XML > >> >> >> files and we have not the source code and the IDE to modify / > >> >> >> re-compile > >> >> >> code. Useful in stressing tests to optimize configurations. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ********************************* > >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> intended solely for the addressees. > >> >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. > >> >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. > >> >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if > altered, > >> >> >> changed > >> >> >> or falsified. > >> >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please > cancel > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> immediately and inform the sender. > >> >> >> ******************************** > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ********************************* > >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> intended solely for the addressees. > >> >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. > >> >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. > >> >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if > altered, > >> >> >> changed > >> >> >> or falsified. > >> >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please > cancel > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> immediately and inform the sender. > >> >> >> ******************************** > >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> aspectj-users mailing list > >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > aspectj-users mailing list > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> aspectj-users mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > > ............................................................................................................................... > >> > Henrique Rebelo > >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/%7Ehemr> > >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > aspectj-users mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aspectj-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > > > > -- > > > ............................................................................................................................... > > Henrique Rebelo > > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/%7Ehemr> > > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > -- ............................................................................................................................... Henrique Rebelo http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
