Hi, I didn't write about using it in that way as we don't 100% yet define the rules there - well I might define it as undefined right now :) It might work right now but I'd need to confirm I want that ordering to remain reliable and stable. Any values you specify for the removal are actually not used right now, the removal is done based solely on the name - this means you'll get what you want if the removal runs first. I might add value matching enforcement later. Yes, at some point it will be added across all the declare annotation forms for consistency.
Andy On 9 December 2010 23:14, <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that 1.6.11M1 includes removal Annotation for field. > Just a question : > Is this kind of declare annotation below, supported in the same aspect : ? > > @Aspect > public class MyAspect > { > declare @field: int Foo.i: -...@anno(init=0); > declare @field: int Foo.i: @Anno(init=5); > ... > > } > > To override @Anno annotation. If yes for field, will this feature be > extended for method, constructor, class in the final release ? > > Cordialement / Best regards > > Jean-Louis Pasturel > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Andy Clement > Envoyé : jeudi 9 décembre 2010 16:45 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] No Dev-build since 15th of October > > Well spotted. > > The enhancements to declare annotation haven't been implemented yet. > > Andy > > On 9 December 2010 06:28, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Certainly a version to correct in aspecjtools : >> >> AspectJ Compiler 1.6.9 (DEVELOPMENT - Built: Wednesday Dec 8, 2010 at >> 16:30:15 GMT) >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> ________________________________ >> De : [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de >> [email protected] >> Envoyé : jeudi 9 décembre 2010 15:10 >> À : [email protected] >> Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] No Dev-build since 15th of October >> >> >> Thanks Andy to update the dev builds. >> Have you written any document for the new Declare Annotation ( to >> override >> them) ? Is this feature yet implemented at current time, on dev build ? >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> ________________________________ >> De : Jean-Louis PASTUREL >> [mailto:[email protected]] >> Envoyé : lundi 6 décembre 2010 08:16 >> À : '[email protected]' >> Objet : No Dev-build since 15th of October >> >> >> Is there a problem for updating the dev-buid package in the link of >> the home page, since 15th of October? >> I see that Eclipse plugin AJDT has a 1.6.11 dev version >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> ********************************* >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and >> intended solely for the addressees. >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, >> changed or falsified. >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel >> it immediately and inform the sender. >> ******************************** >> >> ********************************* >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and >> intended solely for the addressees. >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, >> changed or falsified. >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel >> it immediately and inform the sender. >> ******************************** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > ********************************* > This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and > intended solely for the addressees. > Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. > Messages are susceptible to alteration. > France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed > or falsified. > If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it > immediately and inform the sender. > ******************************** > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
