Hi SK, This list has no connection with the aopmetrics project. You may get some better help if you join the project mailing list or raise a bug on the project's issue tracker (links are on the project home page). FWIW, I was just able to download the project myself. Perhaps tigris.org was down temporarily.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Kotrappa Sirbi <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All, > > I want to use aopmetrics tool to compare OO Vs AO metrics, please somebody > tell me, how and where i can get these aopmetrics tool,Aopmetrics tool > download from http://aopmetrics.tigris.org/ is not working.Please help me. > > Thanking You, > > Regards > > SK > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Send aspectj-users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of aspectj-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11 (Pasturel) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:47:59 +0100 >> From: Pasturel <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11 >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> I open a new thread to discuss the new feature of 1.6.11 about declare >> annotation >> >> The M1 comes with the removal of an annotation of field like specified in >> the readme : >> >> declare @field: int Foo.i: -...@anno; >> >> It gives me an idea with the + sign as this : >> declare @field: int Foo.i: +...@anno(param=<newValue>); >> >> that means a force replace : if @Anno exists remove it and replaces with >> the new parametrized @Anno.If not already exists creates it with the >> parametrized Anno. >> >> Without the - sign and without the + sign, it creates the Annotation on >> field or if already exists throws an exception ( that is certainly the >> current behavior => Andy?). >> >> What do you think about that ? >> >> JL PASTUREL >> >> <Andy_Post> >> >> Hi, >> >> I didn't write about using it in that way as we don't 100% yet define >> the rules there - well I might define it as undefined right now:) It >> might work right now but I'd need to confirm I want that ordering to >> remain reliable and stable. Any values you specify for the removal >> are actually not used right now, the removal is done based solely on >> the name - this means you'll get what you want if the removal runs >> first. I might add value matching enforcement later. Yes, at some >> point it will be added across all the declare annotation forms for >> consistency. >> >> Andy >> </Andy_Post> >> >> >> On 9 December 2010 23:14,<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I see that 1.6.11M1 includes removal Annotation for field. >> > Just a question : >> > Is this kind of declare annotation below, supported in the same aspect >> > : ? >> > >> > �...@aspect >> > public class MyAspect >> > { >> > declare @field: int Foo.i: -...@anno(init=0); >> > declare @field: int Foo.i: @Anno(init=5); >> > ... >> > >> > } >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> >> End of aspectj-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9 >> ******************************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
