Hi, As I mentioned at the end of the article, support for value variants is added as compelling use cases come up. String/enum were originally added, since then 'int' has been added. array has not been added and that is what you are trying.
I've raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=367042 to cover the array case. It won't be as straightforward as the others though, I presume you'd want to bind multiple entries in an array or bind a specific entry and not others. cheers, Andy On 15 December 2011 11:53, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting, I have not seen such usage before. But your blog does not > explain which scenarios are supported. > > For instance, I have the following annotation: > ================================================== > package com.shunra.poc.security; > > import java.lang.annotation.ElementType; > import java.lang.annotation.Retention; > import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy; > import java.lang.annotation.Target; > > @Target({ ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE }) > @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) > public @interface Authorize { > KnownRole[] allow(); > } > ================================================== > package com.shunra.poc.security; > > import org.restlet.security.Role; > > public enum KnownRole { > USER("user", "A limited user."), ADMINISTRATOR("admin", "The system > administrator."), GUEST("guest", "A guest user."); > > public final Role Value; > private KnownRole(String name, String description) { > Value = new Role(name, description); > } > } > ================================================== > > So, how can I use it? The following pointcut does not compile: > ================================================== > // Bind just the part of the annotation of interest: > pointcut colouredMethods(KnownRole role): > execution(public @Authorize * *(..)) && > @annotation(Authorize(allow = { role })); > ================================================== > > It does not compile. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Why-annotations-are-not-exposed-through-JoinPoint-StaticPart-tp4196637p4201678.html > Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
