Andy, Thanks for your efforts. It is really appreciated.
I suspect markers wont be enough for you? If so if you can tell me > the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the > annotation I'll do those first. Thats correct. I need the following types: - string - long - boolean - class It would be great to have a dev / nightly build with the ability to define annotations within the aop.xml thanks again, domi On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Andy Clement <[email protected]>wrote: > > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this > feature or > > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem? > > I didn't have plans but as you are asking for it I've done a bit of > hacking this morning. I can currently add annotations to > fields/methods but only simple marker annotations. > > I can do this > > <declare-annotation method="* foo(..))" annotation="@Marker"/> > > you cannot say > > annotation="@Marker(x=y,z=a)" > > I suspect markers wont be enough for you? If so if you can tell me > the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the > annotation I'll do those first. (Obviously supporting all of them > would be nice, but not sure i have time to do that right now). > > Also declare @type won't work right now. > > cheers, > Andy > > On 30 March 2012 04:30, Dominik Mengelt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm interested in the possibility to declare field and method annotations > > directly on concrete aspects in an aop.xml. Basically I have the same > > "problem / feature request" as Thomas on the following post: > > > http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/abstract-quot-declare-method-quot-td3823887.html > > > > What I also found is the following enhancement request from Andrew: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=359159 > > > > On the end of comment 1 Andrew says: > > > >> "A similar model could be extended to > >> support any declares too (anntation/parents)". > > > > > > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this > feature or > > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Domi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
