Me again ... 
Perhaps a better pattern ?  All the code of the around advice is
synchronized

What is the better/correct monitor ( this => the aspect or
thisJoinPoint.getThis() => the woven class) ?

public aspect MySynchronizor {
 
    public  pointcut methods(): execution( public *
*..<class>.<methodToSynchronize>(..));

    Object around(): methods() {
        synchronized(this){  // or synchronized(thisJoinPoint.getThis()) ?)
                Object retour = null;
                retour = proceed();
                ... Some stuff after  proceed
                return retour
                }
        }
 }

Cordialement / Best regards

Jean-Louis Pasturel

-----Message d'origine-----
De : [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de
[email protected]
Envoyé : mardi 4 septembre 2012 08:22
À : [email protected]
Objet : [aspectj-users] LTW:Synchronizing a non synchronized method

 
To synchronize a not synchronized method, does this Aspect do correctly the
job ?
 
public aspect MySynchronizor {
 
    public  pointcut methods(): execution( public *
*..<class>.<methodToSynchronize>(..));

    Object around(): methods() {
        Object retour = null;
        synchronized(this){
                retour = proceed();
                }
        ... Some stuff after the proceed
        return retour
        }
 }

Cordialement / Best regards

Jean-Louis Pasturel





____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par
erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les
pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed,
used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages
that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete 
altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages 
that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to