I do not know which post you are referring to, but I have just created this ticket: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471347
Feel free to improve the description, I could only vaguely describe it in the subject. -- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de Andy Clement schrieb am 29.06.2015 17:39: > That SO question is what inspired my post the other day about how should an > invokedynamic instruction manifest as a joinpoint (which had no replies) - > trying to get into how to support lambda matching. The fact that he needs to > change his pointcut is horrible. > > I haven’t raised an issue for it yet (feel free). Nothing has been done to > handle invokedynamic or the lambda generated methods in a special way but > there > is some infrastructure in place that would help support it. > > >> On Jun 28, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Alexander Kriegisch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Would you please take a look at http://stackoverflow.com/q/30776675/1082681 >> and my (kriegaex) answer there? Is this issue something which can be improved >> in AspectJ? Should I create a ticket? BTW, the result is the same, regardless >> of whether I use AspectJ 1.8.6 or the new developer snapshot based on Eclipse >> Mars. _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
