That's good news.  Any idea how far off 1.8.9 might be?  Just so I can
calibrate the hackiness of my workaround to its expected longevity ;)

Also, if you can give me a heads-up when this makes it into the dev build
on the downloads page I'll take it for a test drive.

Regards
Jaime

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Andy Clement <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hey,
>
> Looks like I didn’t revisit those changes but phew, I’m glad I left myself
> a reminder in that bug that I’d coded up the fix in a branch. I’m just
> testing it now for folding into the imminent 1.8.9 - thanks for the
> reminder.
>
> cheers,
> Andy
>
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Jaime Metcher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Just wondering if any of the fixes for
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=433351 ever made it into a
> release.  I'm revisiting the project this bug came out of, and I'm still
> seeing issues with AspectJ 1.8.7.
>
> Regards
> Jaime
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to