And any thoughts about the suggested compiler option? I remember it was discussed here or on Bugzilla before. It does not seem hard to implement, but I could be wrong. -- Alexander Kriegisch https://scrum-master.de
Andy Clement schrieb am 22.03.2017 17:07: > I see it :) Thanks for pulling this resource together that I can point > people at. > > > On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Alexander Kriegisch > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Andy. >> >> Especially for you I added this remark: >> https://github.com/kriegaex/SO_AJ_MavenWeaveJDK#possible-improvements >> >> ;-) >> >> >> Alexander Kriegisch schrieb am 22.03.2017 16:04: >> >>> Hi community. >>> >>> I have been asked so many times how to do this. Usually I just >>> answer that >>> ** I have done it a few times in the past, >>> ** it is an advanced topic and not suited for beginners, >>> ** JDK weaving is rarely necessary (or makes any sense at all) and >>> can usually be avoided by changing your application or aspect >>> design, >>> ** you should try to avoid it whenever possible. >>> >>> On the other hand, it is a nifty little exercise if you just want to >>> know how far you can go and how powerful AspectJ really is. Under >>> some circumstances it might even be justified to actually do it. >>> >>> So for what it is worth, instead of explaining myself over and over >>> again when being asked on StackOverflow or elsewhere, I have just >>> created a little demo Maven project on GitHub for you if you should >>> really decide to tread that troubled track (quoting Amy Winehouse, >>> the well-known software developer): >>> >>> https://github.com/kriegaex/SO_AJ_MavenWeaveJDK >>> >>> Use at your own risk! ;-) _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
