I would probably need to see a lot of demand before exploring an ajc like experience for Kotlin. It would be a very large amount of effort and binary weaving of the class files can get you a long way. If I had cycles to work on the compile time experience I'd probably prefer to put that into improving the annotation based model, but I know that isn't great for folks relying on inter type declarations and static checking at compile time.
cheers, Andy On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 06:46, Matthew Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > No, Martin, I’m not experiencing these problems, and my mentioning Spring > was tangential. > > I’m basically asking that ajc support Kotlin source files. > > On May 13, 2019, at 5:43 PM, Martin Gainty <[email protected]> wrote: > > from what i see its not a matter of spring like or dislike..its a matter > of keeping JDK class file consist > > aj => .java => .class > > kt => .java => .class > > but this same scenario goes fubar when you switch JDKs ..this is an example > > aj => 1_dot_eight.java => 1_dot_eight.class > > kt => 1_dot_nine.java => 1_dot_none.class > > because spring is native compiled to 1.8 class format ..all .aj and all > .kt dsl files will compile to 1.8 class > access to class files in jar is no problem > doing reflection e.g. Class.forName(One_dot_eight); also no problem > > things fall apart quickly with aj, kt or .java files when you mix 1.8 > class files with 1.9 class files > > (1.9 lambda functions fubar on accessing 1.8 class files) > > maven folk say full compile the whole lot to your runtime JDK will > supposedly cure this scenario > > is this what you're experiencing? > > martin- > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file > > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file> > How to convert a kotlin source file to a java source file - Stack Overflow > - Stack Overflow - Where Developers Learn, Share, & Build Careers > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34957430/how-to-convert-a-kotlin-source-file-to-a-java-source-file> > To convert a Kotlin source file to a Java source file you need to (when > you in Android Studio):. Press Cmd-Shift-A on a Mac, or press Ctrl-Shift-A > on a Windows machine.. Type the action you're looking for: Kotlin Bytecode > and choose Show Kotlin Bytecode from menu. Press Decompile button on the > top of Kotlin Bytecode panel.; Now you get a Decompiled Java file along > with Kotlin file in a ... > stackoverflow.com > > > > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations> > aop - Convert Inter-Type declaraton from .aj to .java with Aspect > annotations - Stack Overflow - Stack Overflow - Where Developers Learn, > Share, & Build Careers > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36780990/convert-inter-type-declaraton-from-aj-to-java-with-aspect-annotations> > What you want is not possible with @AspectJ style, you need to use the > more powerful native syntax. (Why do you want to switch anyway?) The reason > behind this is that the Java compiler can only convert @DeclareParents to a > form in which Village is a subclass of whatever interface implementation > you define in your aspect, for example something like this: > stackoverflow.com > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] < > [email protected]> on behalf of Matthew Adams < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, May 13, 2019 5:53 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [aspectj-users] Formal support for Kotlin? > > Hi all, > > I’ve been doing some googling around to see what I can find with regard to > using AspectJ with Kotlin. Things don’t look particularly great at first > glance: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44364633/aspectj-doesnt-work-with-kotlin > > There are of course many more hits, but it appears the current state of > the art is to compile with kotlin, then apply AspectJ to the kotlin .class > files. > > Problem is, we have some libraries that we can only compile via ajc due to > their design, so I’m wondering what thought has been given to adding kotlin > language support to ajc. I didn’t see any issues requesting Kotlin > language support in ajc so far. Kotlin looks promising, and it appears > that Spring also is liking Kotlin enough to add support for it. I’d love > to have my Kotlin & AspectJ, too. > > Any comments, folks? > > -matthew > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
